In a dramatic turn of events, a heated evidentiary hearing unfolded on Thursday, shedding light on alleged misconduct by Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis, who has purported ties to George Soros. The focus of the courtroom showdown? Whether Willis, embroiled in the Trump RICO case, should be ousted from her position.

As reported by the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, startling revelations emerged suggesting that Fani Willis had more than just a professional relationship with Nathan Wade, a key figure in the Trump prosecution team. It’s alleged that Willis “financially benefited” from a romantic entanglement with Wade, a fact that has sent shockwaves through the legal community.

Michael Roman, a co-defendant in Trump’s RICO case, didn’t mince words, filing a scathing rebuttal accusing Willis of deceiving the court regarding her affair with Wade, whom she had personally appointed.

During the hearing, Nathan Wade himself took the stand, testifying under oath to the pecuniary exchanges that allegedly took place between him and Willis. Shockingly, Wade claimed he footed the bill for numerous lavish expenditures, including vacations, hotels, and transportation, all of which Willis allegedly reimbursed him for in cash.

The courtroom atmosphere grew tense as evidence mounted. Bank statements provided by Jocelyn Wade purportedly revealed expenditures on behalf of Willis, including flights to exotic locales like Miami and San Francisco.

However, the most explosive moment came when Fani Willis herself took the witness stand. Her demeanor was described as hostile and defiant, as she vehemently denied any wrongdoing. Under intense cross-examination by Michael Roman’s attorney, Ashleigh Merchant, Willis faced tough questions about the timeline and nature of her relationship with Nathan Wade.

In a startling outburst, Willis erupted, accusing Merchant of deceit before the proceedings were temporarily halted. However, Judge Scott McAfee made it clear that the matter was far from settled. He hinted at the possibility of disqualifying Willis from the case due to the apparent conflict of interest posed by her relationship with Wade.

“It’s abundantly clear that disqualification may be warranted if evidence demonstrates a genuine conflict or even the appearance of one,” Judge McAfee remarked during Monday’s hearing. “Given the admissions made by the state regarding the existence of a relationship, it’s imperative to thoroughly investigate the alleged financial benefits, if any, to establish a comprehensive record.”

The legal saga surrounding Fani Willis and her purported ties to Nathan Wade continues to unfold, promising further twists and turns in the high-stakes Trump RICO case.

WATCH: